There is no distinction in DT between the PCI controller device and the
root bridge, whereas such distinction exists from dm's perspective. Make
sure the root bridge ofnode is assigned to the controller's platform
device node.

This permits setups like this to work correctly:

        pcie {
                compatible = "...";
                ...
                dev {
                        reg = <0 0 0 0 0>;
                        ...
                };
        };

Without this the dev node is assigned to the root bridge and the
actual device search starts one level lower than expected.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulie...@suse.de>
---
 drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c b/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c
index 9ab3539a49..ea27e78465 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-uclass.c
@@ -762,7 +762,20 @@ static int pci_find_and_bind_driver(struct udevice *parent,
        str = strdup(name);
        if (!str)
                return -ENOMEM;
-       drv = bridge ? "pci_bridge_drv" : "pci_generic_drv";
+
+       if (bridge) {
+               drv = "pci_bridge_drv";
+
+               /*
+                * If we're dealing with the root bridge pass the parent device
+                * node, as there isn't a distinction in device tree between
+                * that and the actual controller platform device.
+                */
+               if (!PCI_MASK_BUS(bdf))
+                       node = parent->node;
+       } else {
+               drv = "pci_generic_drv";
+       }
 
        ret = device_bind_driver_to_node(parent, drv, str, node, devp);
        if (ret) {
-- 
2.26.2

Reply via email to