On 2010/09/04 11:07 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 04/09/2010 10:22, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : >> Le 26/08/2010 15:16, Rogan Dawes a écrit : >> >>> Anything wrong with this patch? >> >> I think I finally found what was bugging me with it. >> >> Granted, there are cases where we don't want two devices per bus, but >> this is a requirement unrelated to the maximum number of busses and >> devices: this is simply due to the fact that we're on a SATA, not PATA, >> controller. >> >> I think that, rather than modifying IDE_BUS(dev), you should introduce a >> CONFIG_SYS_IDE_MAXDEVICE_PER_BUS config option that will limit how many >> devices will be probed for on a given bus. >> >> Without this config option, for each bus B there can be up to two >> devices, numbered (B*2) and (B*2+1); with the config option, there can >> be only one device numbered (B*2). In all cases, IDE_BUS(dev) can remain >> defined as (dev>> 1) which will always amount to B. >> >> Amicalement, > > Rogan, > > Actually, I am looking into refactoring the cmd_ide.c code right now, > because I'll need it for supporting the net5big's eight ports and > devices. Do you mind if I give a try at my own suggestion? > > Amicalement,
By all means. Have at it! :-) Rogan _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot