On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 12:52:22AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Tom, > > > Subject: [PATCH] arm: mx6: Make all i.MX6 SoCs user-selectable > > > [....] > > > + > > config MX6UL_LITESOM > > bool > > select DM > > select DM_THERMAL > > - select MX6UL > > Would keep it here to simplify defconfig?
No. The litesom / opos6 cases highlight that we have two different ways SoM+carrier are being handled today and those too could use unifacation. But we can't drop MX6UL_LITESOM (or MX6UL_OPOS6UL) and would have arch/arm/mach-imx/mx6/Makefile reference CONFIG_TARGET_xxx options, which isn't something that looks right. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
