On Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:44:57 Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
>      But, wanted to share my experience on the same topic. Posed with
>      same problem, I had looked at minimizing the u-boot binary and
>      had managed to reach 29-30KB

the Blackfin one is in the range of 200-600 bytes.  i dont care how 
configurable you make u-boot, it isnt getting to that.

>      In short, shouldn't we make u-boot more "configurable" so that
>      parts we consider "integral" in u-boot today can also be excluded
>      e.g. support for unzip, tftp, ...

yes, we should do this anyways.  i have another use of u-boot where i wanted 
it down to the 30KiB range, and that required posting patches to make things 
more configurable.  most have been merged already.
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to