On 9/3/20 7:40 AM, André Przywara wrote: > On 03/09/2020 14:35, Michal Simek wrote: >> >> >> On 02. 09. 20 18:34, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 9/2/20 5:15 AM, Michal Simek wrote: >>>> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com> >>>> >>>> When U-Boot binary exceeds 1MB with CONFIG_POSITION_INDEPENDENT=y >>>> compilation error is shown: >>>> /mnt/disk/u-boot/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S:71:(.text+0x3c): relocation >>>> truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_LO21 against symbol `__rel_dyn_end' >>>> defined in .bss_start section in u-boot. >>>> >>>> It is caused by adr instruction which permits the calculation of any byte >>>> address within +- 1MB of the current PC. >>>> Because U-Boot is bigger then 1MB calculation is failing. >>>> >>>> The patch is using adrp/add instructions where adrp shifts a signed, 21-bit >>>> immediate left by 12 bits (4k page), adds it to the value of the program >>>> counter with the bottom 12 bits cleared to zero. Then add instruction >>>> provides the lower 12 bits which is offset within 4k page. >>>> These two instructions together compose full 32bit offset which should be >>>> more then enough to cover the whole u-boot size. >>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S b/arch/arm/cpu/armv8/start.S >>> >>>> @@ -67,8 +67,10 @@ pie_fixup: >>>> adr x0, _start /* x0 <- Runtime value of _start */ >>>> ldr x1, _TEXT_BASE /* x1 <- Linked value of _start */ >>>> sub x9, x0, x1 /* x9 <- Run-vs-link offset */ >>>> - adr x2, __rel_dyn_start /* x2 <- Runtime &__rel_dyn_start */ >>>> - adr x3, __rel_dyn_end /* x3 <- Runtime &__rel_dyn_end */ >>>> + adrp x2, __rel_dyn_start /* x2 <- Runtime &__rel_dyn_start */ >>>> + add x2, x2, #:lo12:__rel_dyn_start >>>> + adrp x3, __rel_dyn_end /* x3 <- Runtime &__rel_dyn_end */ >>>> + add x3, x3, #:lo12:__rel_dyn_end >>>> pie_fix_loop: >>>> ldp x0, x1, [x2], #16 /* (x0, x1) <- (Link location, fixup) */ >>>> ldr x4, [x2], #8 /* x4 <- addend */ >>> >>> There are likely a bunch of other places in the code that need updating >>> too; take a look at commit 49e93875a62f "arm64: support running at addr >>> other than linked to" (which introduced the code above) to find other >>> places with similar instruction sequences that almost certainly need >>> updating. >>> >> >> I didn't hit any issue to have a need to update them. Definitely worth >> to check that locations too. > > So I thought the same, so I checked at least this file. And while there > are other "adr" instructions, they only go to nearby labels, so don't > need to be pumped up. > But I will try to grep for more cases as well.
So in the patch I linked to, what about the added ard instructions in arch/arm/lib/crt0_64.S and arch/arm/lib/relocate_64.S? Perhaps that code gets linked more towards the middle of U-Boot than the code you're fixing in start.S, so the max 1M offset just happens to reach all the relevant symbols and relocations that are in your current binary, but if your binary gets a little larger (e.g. goes from 1.05M to 2M say) that code will fail in the same way?
