Hi Michal, On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 03:01, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > On 07. 09. 20 3:43, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Michal, > > > > On Thu, 3 Sep 2020 at 06:30, Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 03. 09. 20 13:16, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > >>> On 9/3/20 1:03 PM, Michal Simek wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> We have several use cases where customers want to partition memory by > >>>> putting NS images above 4GB. On Xilinx arm 64bit SOC 0-2GB can be used > >>>> for > >>>> others CPU in the systems (like R5) or for secure sw. > >>>> Currently there is limitation in SPL to record load/entry addresses in > >>>> 64bit format because they are recorded in 32bit only. > >>>> This series add support for it. > >>>> Patches have been tested on Xilinx ZynqMP zcu102 board in SD bootmode > >>>> with > >>>> images generated by binman. Because u-boot is using > >>>> CONFIG_POSITION_INDEPENDENT it can be put to others 4k aligned addresses > >>>> and there is no real need to build it to certain offset. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Michal > >>> > >>> Hello Michal, > >>> > >>> does this series require changes to doc/uImage.FIT/source_file_format.txt? > >> > >> I am not changing fit format. I am just changing how SPL records > >> loadables in DT fit-images node. And also series is using FIT functions > >> for reading these properties (at least in this version). > > > > Well I think there should be some mention of the 32/64 bit issue added > > to the FIT docs. How about adding an example with 64-bit addresses? > > git grep "fit-images" doc/ > and output is 0. It means we really don't have any documentation for > fit-images embed node. > It means we should create one. > > /fit-images are related to loadables property that's why I think make > sense to document them together. > > What about doc/uImage.FIT/howto.txt?
Sounds good. Regards, Simon