Le 24/09/2010 07:11, Heiko Schocher a écrit : > I prefer to have this change in one patch, because if we do it so, we > don;t break "git bisect" functionallity.
Not sure I follow you there, so let's dig a little bit into that point. How exactly would that break bisectability? The only difference I see is whether tx25 building succeeds or not; however if being able to build is the criterion for bisectability, this brings us back to all other boards in the tree which will also not build any more with my patch, and whether I should fix them or not. On a side note, I do not know of a clear general definition of 'bisectability', which means I could break it yet again unkonwingly. Can you (or anyone, actually :) ) point me to a, or even the, standard definition of 'bisectable' and, if that has a specific meaning, of 'fully bisectable'? > bye, > Heiko Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
