Hi Ben, On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 19:31:02, Ben Gardiner wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Nori, Sekhar <nsek...@ti.com> wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:44:58, Nori, Sekhar wrote: > >> The TI DA850/OMAP-L138/AM18x EVM can be populated with devices > >> having different maximum allowed CPU clock rating. > >> > >> The maximum clock the chip can support can only be determined from > >> the label on the package (not software readable). > >> > >> Introduce a method to pass the maximum allowed clock rate information > >> to kernel using ATAG_REVISION. The kernel uses this information to > >> determine the maximum cpu clock rate reachable using cpufreq. > >> > >> Note that U-Boot itself does not set the CPU clock rate. The CPU > >> clock is setup by a primary bootloader ("UBL"). The rate setup by > >> UBL could be different from the maximum clock rate supported by the > >> device. > > > > Any more feedback on this patch? There are couple of kernel patches > > which depend on this, that's why I ask. > > FWIW: it's fine with me. > > Applies cleanly to 3df61957938586c512c17e72d83551d190400981 of u-boot/next. > > Tested on da850evm -- bootm of linux uImage works with the patch > 'da850evm: fix linux bootparam address' aplied. > > The kernel uImage used did not have support for parsing the > ATAG_REVISION information since that patch has not been posted to the > davinci-linux list. > > Tested-by: Ben Gardiner <bengardi...@nanometrics.ca>
Thanks for the testing! Regards, Sekhar _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot