On Sunday 25 October 2020 19:55:28 Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 12:04:54AM +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > On Saturday 24 October 2020 08:19:31 Tom Rini wrote: > > > Let me add in the TI folks that might be able to look in to any of this > > > today. But the next problem is that the rx51 needs to be converted to > > > use DM in U-Boot. It's throwing up a ton of "you need to convert to X > > > by <some release in 2019> or this board may be removed" warnings at > > > build. I really really want to see some of this start to be addressed. > > > > Well, I do not see any warnings at build, I'm building U-Boot by command: > > > > $ make nokia_rx51_defconfig && make SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=0 ARCH=arm > > CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabi- u-boot.bin > > Note that ARCH=arm is meaningless in U-Boot. > > > Maybe I'm doing something wrong that I do not see it? Or is there any > > other way to "list all issues for N900" which needs to be addressed? > > Yes, the "all" target.
Ok, now I see them! I used in all my scripts only u-boot.bin target (as I needed only this one binary), so basically all warnings were perfectly hidden also in past and I did not know about it... Maybe there are more people who do not know about these warnings? What about printing them as part of u-boot.bin target? > > Anyway, I'm looking at DM and as the first step I will do conversion of > > code to CONFIG_DM_I2C. It is OK for you? Maybe it brings some light to > > non-working second i2c bus. > > > > I hope that TI (or other) developers look at that mmc issue as this is > > blocking all N900 users. > > Maybe converting to DM_MMC will also clear up or shed more light on the > problem you have there as well. > > -- > Tom