On 22/12/2020 23:28, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> On 12/19/20 11:51 PM, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
>> From: Amit Singh Tomar <amittome...@gmail.com>
>>
>> This patch adds node for ethernet controller found on Action Semi OWL
>> S700 SoC.
>
> Is "ethernet controller" right?
>
>>
>> Since, upstream Linux binding has not been merged for S700 MMC/SD
>> controller, Changes are put in u-boot specific dtsi file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <amittome...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since previous version
>> * No change.
>> ---
>> arch/arm/dts/s700-u-boot.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/s700-u-boot.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/s700-u-boot.dtsi
>> index 1b27682..3c3396b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/s700-u-boot.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/s700-u-boot.dtsi
>> @@ -19,6 +19,16 @@
>> status = "okay";
>> };
>>
>> + mmc0: mmc@e0210000 {
>> + compatible = "actions,s700-mmc", "actions,owl-mmc";
>
> Not need to add both..
We *do* need to have both:
a) it's good style to list "chip-specific", "generic-compatible-model"
for a certain SoC. This allows to later cover bugs or enhancements
without changing the DT.
b) it's what Linux will get
c) it's already the documented binding:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/owl-mmc.yaml
Cheers,
Andre
>
>> + reg = <0x0 0xe0210000 0x0 0x4000>;
>> + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 42 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> + clocks = <&cmu CLK_SD0>;
>> + dmas = <&dma 2>;
>> + dma-names = "mmc";
>> + bus-width = <4>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> };
>> };
>>
>>
>
