On 14.01.21 20:24, Tom Rini wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 07:43:56PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > >> Dear Tom, >> >> The following changes since commit ee6726be4f0dccb612f0193c62ca149164c8a5af: >> >> Merge tag 'ti-v2021.04-rc1' of >> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-ti (2021-01-12 09:32:48 >> -0500) >> >> are available in the Git repository at: >> >> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi.git >> tags/efi-2021-04-rc1 >> >> for you to fetch changes up to 8e70f1cb3f2c18d574b087d4fc1d79e68ce98fa9: >> >> efi_selftest: dtbdump support EFI_DT_FIXUP_PROTOCOL (2021-01-13 >> 02:38:01 +0100) >> >> Gitlab showed no problems: >> https://gitlab.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi/-/pipelines/5854 >> > > Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! > > But! This got me to look a little harder at things and even if we have > a platform where we disable ext4/fat write support, there's no change in > the EFI side of the code. Is this something we can do anything about? > If so, is it worthwhile or likely to really only change a few boards and > I'm just grasping at straws, so to speak, on the question of "Can we do > anything to reduce EFI code size" ?
I assume you already have disabled: CONFIG_EFI_DEVICE_PATH_TO_TEXT CONFIG_EFI_LOADER_HII CONFIG_EFI_UNICODE_COLLATION_PROTOCOL2 Could you, please, give me an example config to work on? Best regards Heinrich
