On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 10:26:00AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > Calling calloc() for 0 members does not make any sense. > Setting ch_priv->busy_desc = NULL for ch_priv->desc_cnt > 0 is equally > unreasonable. > > The current code will lead to a NULL dereference in bcm6348_iudma_enable(). > > The assignments for ch_priv->busy_desc are obviously swapped. > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
