On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:43:39AM +0100, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> From: Igor Opaniuk <igor.opan...@foundries.io>
>
> This adds support for RPC test trusted application emulation, which
> permits to test reverse RPC calls to TEE supplicant. Currently it covers
> requests to the I2C bus from TEE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor Opaniuk <igor.opan...@foundries.io>
> ---
> drivers/tee/Makefile | 2 +
> drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig | 9 +++
> drivers/tee/sandbox.c | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/tee/optee_ta_rpc_test.h | 28 +++++++
> 4 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/tee/optee_ta_rpc_test.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/Makefile b/drivers/tee/Makefile
> index 5c8ffdbce8..ff844195ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/tee/Makefile
> @@ -2,5 +2,7 @@
>
> obj-y += tee-uclass.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_SANDBOX) += sandbox.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_OPTEE_TA_RPC_TEST) += optee/supplicant.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_OPTEE_TA_RPC_TEST) += optee/i2c.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_OPTEE) += optee/
> obj-y += broadcom/
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig b/drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig
> index d489834df9..65622f30b1 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/tee/optee/Kconfig
> @@ -22,6 +22,15 @@ config OPTEE_TA_AVB
> The TA can support the "avb" subcommands "read_rb", "write"rb"
> and "is_unlocked".
>
> +config OPTEE_TA_RPC_TEST
> + bool "Support RPC TEST TA"
> + depends on SANDBOX_TEE
> + default y
> + help
> + Enables support for RPC test trusted application emulation, which
> + permits to test reverse RPC calls to TEE supplicant. Should
> + be used only in sandbox env.
> +
> endmenu
>
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/tee/sandbox.c b/drivers/tee/sandbox.c
> index 4b91e7db1b..1cacd443f4 100644
> --- a/drivers/tee/sandbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/tee/sandbox.c
> @@ -7,11 +7,15 @@
> #include <sandboxtee.h>
> #include <tee.h>
> #include <tee/optee_ta_avb.h>
> +#include <tee/optee_ta_rpc_test.h>
> +
> +#include "optee/optee_msg.h"
> +#include "optee/optee_private.h"
>
> /*
> * The sandbox tee driver tries to emulate a generic Trusted Exectution
> - * Environment (TEE) with the Trusted Application (TA) OPTEE_TA_AVB
> - * available.
> + * Environment (TEE) with the Trusted Applications (TA) OPTEE_TA_AVB and
> + * OPTEE_TA_RPC_TEST available.
> */
>
> static const u32 pstorage_max = 16;
> @@ -32,7 +36,32 @@ struct ta_entry {
> struct tee_param *params);
> };
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OPTEE_TA_AVB
> +static int get_msg_arg(struct udevice *dev, uint num_params,
> + struct tee_shm **shmp, struct optee_msg_arg **msg_arg)
> +{
> + int rc;
> + struct optee_msg_arg *ma;
> +
> + rc = __tee_shm_add(dev, OPTEE_MSG_NONCONTIG_PAGE_SIZE, NULL,
> + OPTEE_MSG_GET_ARG_SIZE(num_params), TEE_SHM_ALLOC,
> + shmp);
> + if (rc)
> + return rc;
> +
> + ma = (*shmp)->addr;
> + memset(ma, 0, OPTEE_MSG_GET_ARG_SIZE(num_params));
> + ma->num_params = num_params;
> + *msg_arg = ma;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +inline void *optee_alloc_and_init_page_list(void *buf, ulong len,
> + u64 *phys_buf_ptr)
Why "inline"?
> +{
> + return 0;
How can this work? I'd expect an eventual caller to get a bit
disappointed. By the way aren't we usually using NULL for pointers in
U-Boot?
> +}
> +
> static u32 get_attr(uint n, uint num_params, struct tee_param *params)
> {
> if (n >= num_params)
> @@ -63,6 +92,7 @@ bad_params:
> return TEE_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OPTEE_TA_AVB
> static u32 ta_avb_open_session(struct udevice *dev, uint num_params,
> struct tee_param *params)
> {
> @@ -214,7 +244,100 @@ static u32 ta_avb_invoke_func(struct udevice *dev, u32
> func, uint num_params,
> return TEE_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> }
> }
> -#endif /*OPTEE_TA_AVB*/
> +#endif /* OPTEE_TA_AVB */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OPTEE_TA_RPC_TEST
> +static u32 ta_rpc_test_open_session(struct udevice *dev, uint num_params,
> + struct tee_param *params)
> +{
> + /*
> + * We don't expect additional parameters when opening a session to
> + * this TA.
> + */
> + return check_params(TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_NONE, TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_NONE,
> + TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_NONE, TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_NONE,
> + num_params, params);
> +}
> +
> +static void fill_i2c_rpc_params(struct optee_msg_arg *msg_arg, u64 bus_num,
> + u64 chip_addr, u64 op,
> + struct tee_param_memref memref)
> +{
> + msg_arg->params[0].attr = OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT;
> + msg_arg->params[1].attr = OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT;
> + msg_arg->params[2].attr = OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_RMEM_INOUT;
> + msg_arg->params[3].attr = OPTEE_MSG_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_OUTPUT;
> +
> + /* trigger I2C services of TEE supplicant */
> + msg_arg->cmd = OPTEE_MSG_RPC_CMD_I2C_TRANSFER;
> +
> + msg_arg->params[0].u.value.a = op;
> + msg_arg->params[0].u.value.b = bus_num;
> + msg_arg->params[0].u.value.c = chip_addr;
> +
> + /* buffer to read/write data */
> + msg_arg->params[2].u.rmem.shm_ref = (ulong)memref.shm;
> + msg_arg->params[2].u.rmem.size = memref.size;
> + msg_arg->params[2].u.rmem.offs = memref.shm_offs;
> +
> + msg_arg->num_params = 4;
> +}
> +
> +static u32 ta_rpc_test_invoke_func(struct udevice *dev, u32 func,
> + uint num_params,
> + struct tee_param *params)
> +{
> + struct tee_shm *shm;
> + struct tee_param_memref memref_data;
> + struct optee_msg_arg *msg_arg;
> + int chip_addr, bus_num, op;
> + int res;
> +
> + res = check_params(TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_VALUE_INPUT,
> + TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_MEMREF_INOUT,
> + TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_NONE,
> + TEE_PARAM_ATTR_TYPE_NONE,
> + num_params, params);
> + if (res)
> + return TEE_ERROR_BAD_PARAMETERS;
> +
> + bus_num = params[0].u.value.a;
> + chip_addr = params[0].u.value.b;
> + memref_data = params[1].u.memref;
> +
> + switch (func) {
> + case TA_RPC_TEST_CMD_I2C_READ:
> + op = OPTEE_MSG_RPC_CMD_I2C_TRANSFER_RD;
> + break;
> + case TA_RPC_TEST_CMD_I2C_WRITE:
> + op = OPTEE_MSG_RPC_CMD_I2C_TRANSFER_WR;
> + break;
> + default:
> + return TEE_ERROR_NOT_SUPPORTED;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * Fill params for an RPC call to tee supplicant
> + */
> + res = get_msg_arg(dev, 4, &shm, &msg_arg);
> + if (res)
> + goto bad;
> +
> + fill_i2c_rpc_params(msg_arg, bus_num, chip_addr, op, memref_data);
> +
> + /* Make an RPC call to tee supplicant */
> + optee_suppl_cmd(dev, shm, 0);
> + res = msg_arg->ret;
> +
> +bad:
> + tee_shm_free(shm);
> +
> + if (res)
> + return res;
> +
> + return TEE_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_OPTEE_TA_RPC_TEST */
>
> static const struct ta_entry ta_entries[] = {
> #ifdef CONFIG_OPTEE_TA_AVB
> @@ -223,6 +346,12 @@ static const struct ta_entry ta_entries[] = {
> .invoke_func = ta_avb_invoke_func,
> },
> #endif
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OPTEE_TA_RPC_TEST
> + { .uuid = TA_RPC_TEST_UUID,
> + .open_session = ta_rpc_test_open_session,
> + .invoke_func = ta_rpc_test_invoke_func,
> + },
> +#endif
> };
>
> static void sandbox_tee_get_version(struct udevice *dev,
> diff --git a/include/tee/optee_ta_rpc_test.h b/include/tee/optee_ta_rpc_test.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000..cae2fb04b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/tee/optee_ta_rpc_test.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause */
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Foundries Ltd */
> +
> +#ifndef __TA_RPC_TEST_H
> +#define __TA_RPC_TEST_H
> +
> +#define TA_RPC_TEST_UUID { 0x48420575, 0x96ca, 0x401a, \
> + { 0x89, 0x91, 0x1e, 0xfd, 0xce, 0xbd, 0x7d, 0x04 } }
> +
> +/*
> + * Does a reverse RPC call for I2C read
> + *
> + * in params[0].value.a: bus number
> + * in params[0].value.b: chip address
> + * inout params[1].u.memref: buffer to read data
> + */
> +#define TA_RPC_TEST_CMD_I2C_READ 0
> +
> +/*
> + * Does a reverse RPC call for I2C write
> + *
> + * in params[0].value.a: bus number
> + * in params[0].value.b: chip address
> + * inout params[1].u.memref: buffer with data to write
> + */
> +#define TA_RPC_TEST_CMD_I2C_WRITE 1
> +
> +#endif /* __TA_RPC_TEST_H */
> --
> 2.17.1
>
