Hi Patrick,

On 2/9/21 9:11 AM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
Hi,

On 1/11/21 4:41 PM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
Prepare the source tree for accepting implementations of the ECDSA
algorithm. This patch deals with the boring aspects of Makefiles and
Kconfig files.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc<mr.nuke...@gmail.com>
---
  include/image.h          | 10 +++++-----
  include/u-boot/rsa.h     |  2 +-
  lib/Kconfig              |  1 +
  lib/Makefile             |  1 +
  lib/ecdsa/Kconfig        | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
  lib/ecdsa/Makefile       |  1 +
  lib/ecdsa/ecdsa-verify.c | 13 +++++++++++++
  7 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
  create mode 100644 lib/ecdsa/Kconfig
  create mode 100644 lib/ecdsa/Makefile
  create mode 100644 lib/ecdsa/ecdsa-verify.c

diff --git a/include/image.h b/include/image.h
index 6628173dca..1d70ba0ece 100644
--- a/include/image.h
+++ b/include/image.h
@@ -1198,20 +1198,20 @@ int calculate_hash(const void *data, int data_len, const char *algo,
  #if defined(USE_HOSTCC)
  # if defined(CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE)
  #  define IMAGE_ENABLE_SIGN    1
-#  define IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY    1
+#  define IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY_RSA    1
  #  define IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY_ECDSA    1
  #  define FIT_IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY    1
  #  include <openssl/evp.h>
  # else
  #  define IMAGE_ENABLE_SIGN    0
-#  define IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY    0
+#  define IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY_RSA    0
  # define IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY_ECDSA    0
  #  define FIT_IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY    0
  # endif
  #else
  # define IMAGE_ENABLE_SIGN    0
-# define IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY        CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(RSA_VERIFY)
-# define IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY_ECDSA    0
+# define IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY_RSA    CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(RSA_VERIFY)
+# define IMAGE_ENABLE_VERIFY_ECDSA    CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(ECDSA_VERIFY)

here you are using CONFIG_IS_ENABLED.

This macro imply to test CONFIG_ECDSA_VERIFY or CONFIG_SPL_ECDSA_VERIFY (for SPL build)

=> but CONFIG_SPL_ECDSA_VERIFY is missing, I think you need to add it, as RSA

This patch adds both "config ECDSA_VERIFY" and "config SPL_ECDSA_VERIFY"
see @lib/ecdsa/Kconfig. I believe this achieves what you need.

[snip]
diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
index cf64188ba5..ab86be2678 100644
--- a/lib/Makefile
+++ b/lib/Makefile
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ endif
  obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)ACPIGEN) += acpi/
  obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)MD5) += md5.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_ECDSA) += ecdsa/

obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)ECDSA) += ecdsa/

The intent here is to use CONFIG_ECDSA to denote ECDSA support. CONFIG_ECDSA_VERIFY and CONFIG_SPL_ECDSA_VERIFY are used to enable the code in u-boot and SPL respectively. Only verification is supported on the target, so these are the only switches that enable or disable code.


  obj-$(CONFIG_$(SPL_)RSA) += rsa/
  obj-$(CONFIG_FIT_SIGNATURE) += hash-checksum.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_SHA1) += sha1.o
diff --git a/lib/ecdsa/Kconfig b/lib/ecdsa/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..1244d6b6ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/ecdsa/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+config ECDSA
+    bool "Enable ECDSA support"
+    depends on DM
+    help
+      This enables the ECDSA algorithm for FIT image verification in U-Boot.
+      See doc/uImage.FIT/signature.txt for more details.
+      The ECDSA algorithm is implemented using the driver model. So
+      CONFIG_DM is required by this library.
+      ECDSA is enabled for mkimage regardless of this  option.
+
+if ECDSA
+

Add CONFIG_SPL_ECDSA to select independently support in SPL et/or in U-Boot
as it is done for RSA

+ config SPL_ECDSA
+    bool "Use ECDSA library within in SPL"

I though about an SPL_ECDSA kconfig. As mentioned above, we have independent switches to enable the code for u-boot/SPL. We can enable ECDSA support in u-boot, SPL, neither or both. What would this switch add?


+config ECDSA_VERIFY
+    bool "Enable ECDSA verification support in U-Boot."


+ select SPL_ECDSA


+    help
+      Allow ECDSA signatures to be recognized and verified in U-Boot.
+
+config SPL_ECDSA_VERIFY
+    bool "Enable ECDSA verification support in SPL"
+    help
+      Allow ECDSA signatures to be recognized and verified in SPL.

This is the switch for SPL (@mentioned earlier).


Alex

Reply via email to