On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:36:03PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> In cpu_to_be32_array() and be32_to_cpu_array() we should not compare an int
> counter to a size_t parameter. Correct the type of the counter.
>
> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
> ---
> include/linux/byteorder/generic.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
> b/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
> index 8fae186d1a..bee0ff6033 100644
> --- a/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
> +++ b/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static inline void be64_add_cpu(__be64 *var, u64 val)
>
> static inline void cpu_to_be32_array(__be32 *dst, const u32 *src, size_t len)
> {
> - int i;
> + size_t i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> dst[i] = cpu_to_be32(src[i]);
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static inline void cpu_to_be32_array(__be32 *dst, const
> u32 *src, size_t len)
>
> static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len)
> {
> - int i;
> + size_t i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> dst[i] = be32_to_cpu(src[i]);This was fixed in what commit from Linux? Thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
