On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 03:05:53PM +0100, John Keeping wrote: > It's possible that LOAD_FIT_FULL will have different values for TPL and > SPL, in which case just checking CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT_FULL causes this to > be compiled in to the TPL even though functions and struct members it > depends on are not. > > Use CONFIG_IS_ENABLED() to ensure the correct TPL/SPL variant is > checked. > > Signed-off-by: John Keeping <j...@metanate.com> > Reviewed-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
