On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 07:59:21AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Tom, > > In message <20210802213100.GG9379@bill-the-cat> you wrote: > > > > I think that if nothing changes the banner not changing is the right > > behavior. > > Hm... is it? How about "external" changes like building with a > different tool chain? Then at least the "version" command should > produce a corresponding output, which means some parts _have_ to be > recompiled, resulting in a new banner, too ?
There's some misunderstanding about what this series does, and does not do. First, with the series applied and you don't force SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, and you run make, and you re-run make, cmd/version.c is rebuilt (but only that and not a bunch of other things anymore) and the banner timestamp changes. Second, if you do set SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH to a fixed value (so you're trying to reproduce a build with a specific timestamp) AND re-run make, nothing changes, as it should. Third, if you change gcc, everything gets rebuilt including cmd/version.c and a new banner. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
