> -----Original Message----- > From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de > [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Nishanth Menon > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 6:09 AM > To: Peter Barada > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] ARM: OMAP3/4: proposal: Cleanup MUX > > Peter Barada wrote, on 11/05/2010 11:59 PM: > > Personally I'd like to see the kernel and u-boot disconnect on the > > Looks like we are getting to a consensus - we all seem to dislike the > dependency of u-boot and kernel for mux as of today - can we > think about
[sp] In my opinion, we need to do minimal and necessary MUX settings in u-boot and let kernel manage itself. This also helps ensure that problems noticed in kernel are easy to replicate on other similar platforms. Last year I spent long time in convincing that wake-up on keypad was not working in Linux kernel; but folks using OMAP3430SDP maintained it worked fine. Root cause - relevant PADCONF was set in u-boot for 3430SDP. (not quoting mail-chain) We may not be able to eliminate such instances altogether - but can have less of such instances. > post 2011March as a good time to start pushing the relevant > changes in? > if that is the case, I will start posting RFCs in the coming weeks so [sp] Can you list what chanages you are trying to propose? ...without going as far as RFC. the mails quoted in previous message are again too long and wide in discussion. A concise list will help. ~sanjeev > that we can get the relevant changes ready on time. Ofcourse, > if there > are others wishing to collaborate, folks are more than welcome :) > > -- > Regards, > Nishanth Menon > _______________________________________________ > U-Boot mailing list > U-Boot@lists.denx.de > http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot