Le 10/11/2010 14:24, Daniel Hobi a écrit : > On 10.11.2010 13:48, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Le 10/11/2010 13:31, Daniel Hobi a écrit : >>>>> But shouldn't this change be applied to all ARM linker scripts, ie >>>>> arch/arm/cpu/*/u-boot.lds? >>>> >>>> Yes, it should. :) >>> >>> Can you please provide such a patch? >> >> I could, but I tend to provide patches only for boards that I can test, >> which basically covers only arm926ejs, or that I can get tested; I'd >> prefer not to provide patches for HW that I cannot test, and thus I >> would prefer that patches for other cpus be handled by people who >> actually own boards with these cpus and can test their patching. After >> all, this very bugfix is due to ELF relocations having been tested with >> too poor a range of toolchains. > > I prefer a single patch to solve one problem in all places. And since > you probably have most experience with the new ARM relocation, that > patch should come from you.
Figures. :) > The ARM architecture and board maintainers will test your patch during > the current release cycle. Alright. I'll prepare a V5 patch set with fixes to all ARM cpus. Wolfgang, is a single *patch* for all cpus ok or do you want a single *patchset* with one patch per cpu? Please tell me the single patch approach is ok. :) > Best regards, > Daniel Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot