On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 06:36:12PM +0300, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote: > Hi, > > On 27.10.2021 17.08, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi François, > > > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 00:07, François Ozog <francois.o...@linaro.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Simon > > > > > > Position unchanged on this series: adding fake dts for boards that > > > generate their device tree in the dts directory is not good. If you have > > > them in documentation the it is acceptable. > > > > I think we are going to have to disagree on this one. I actually used > > the qemu one in testing/development recently. We have to have a way to > > develop in-tree with U-Boot. It does not impinge on any of your use > > cases, so far as I know. > > > > How about having the file just contain a single line > > #include <generated-qemu-arm.dts> > > ... where this generated-*.dts is not checked to the source tree. Then of > course comments on how to generate it via qemu -dumpdtb + dtc, with > appropriate precautions (ie. must be regenerated if qemu command line is > changed or qemu is upgraded), intended use case, and so forth.
That seems like it would help the development workflow, yes. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
