Wolfgang Denk wrote: > No, I don't like this. The parts that are not specific to 85xx should > be available to all, and CPU specific (and eventually board specific?) > parts should be possible by calling into respective functions (which > might, for example, have weak dummy implementations).
Ok, I can do it this way, but 99% of the code will be CPU-specific. The whole point behind the function is to compare the device tree numbers with the physical addresses of the actual devices in hardware. Do you want the default weak functions to say something like "not implemented", or just do nothing at all? -- Timur Tabi Linux kernel developer at Freescale _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
