On 12/4/21 07:56, Simon Glass wrote:
Show the revision of this table as it can be important.

Alo update the 'efi table' entry to show the actual address of the EFI

%s/Alo/Also/

table rather than our table that points to it. This saves a step and the
intermediate table has nothing else in it.

Should this information been shown by the 'efi' command instead of 'bdinfo'?

Best regards

Heinrich


Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
---

Changes in v5:
- Fix grammar in commit message

Changes in v3:
- Add new patch to show the system-table revision

  arch/x86/cpu/efi/payload.c | 9 ++++++++-
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/efi/payload.c b/arch/x86/cpu/efi/payload.c
index d2aa889a2b9..b7778565b19 100644
--- a/arch/x86/cpu/efi/payload.c
+++ b/arch/x86/cpu/efi/payload.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
  #include <common.h>
  #include <cpu_func.h>
  #include <efi.h>
+#include <efi_api.h>
  #include <errno.h>
  #include <init.h>
  #include <log.h>
@@ -296,8 +297,14 @@ void setup_efi_info(struct efi_info *efi_info)
  void efi_show_bdinfo(void)
  {
        struct efi_entry_systable *table = NULL;
+       struct efi_system_table *sys_table;
        int size, ret;

        ret = efi_info_get(EFIET_SYS_TABLE, (void **)&table, &size);
-       bdinfo_print_num_l("efi_table", (ulong)table);
+       if (!ret) {
+               bdinfo_print_num_l("efi_table", table->sys_table);
+               sys_table = (struct efi_system_table *)(uintptr_t)
+                       table->sys_table;
+               bdinfo_print_num_l(" revision", sys_table->fw_revision);
+       }
  }


Reply via email to