Hi,

On 1/14/22 1:14 PM, Michal Simek wrote:
From: Ashok Reddy Soma <ashok.reddy.s...@xilinx.com>

Under struct lmb {} the lmb property's should be defined only if
CONFIG_LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS is defined.

Signed-off-by: Ashok Reddy Soma <ashok.reddy.s...@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.si...@xilinx.com>
---

  include/lmb.h | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/lmb.h b/include/lmb.h
index ab277ca80004..1476d78c2823 100644
--- a/include/lmb.h
+++ b/include/lmb.h
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ struct lmb_region {
  struct lmb {
        struct lmb_region memory;
        struct lmb_region reserved;
-#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS)
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS)
        struct lmb_property memory_regions[CONFIG_LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS];
        struct lmb_property reserved_regions[CONFIG_LMB_RESERVED_REGIONS];
  #endif


I think this patch don't change the exiting code

because in lib/Kconfig we have also the dependancy with LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS:

  config LMB_MEMORY_REGIONS
      int "Number of memory regions in lmb lib"
      depends on LMB && !LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS

=> memory_regions and reserved_regions are needed in struc lmb
   only if CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS is not defined
   else it is defined in "struct lmb_region" under the SAME compilation flag


struct lmb_region {
        unsigned long cnt;
        unsigned long max;
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS)
        struct lmb_property region[CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS];
#else
        struct lmb_property *region;
#endif
};

with .region = pointer to 'memory_regions[]' or 'reserved_regions[]' in "struct 
lmb"

I think it is more clear to have the compilation flag in "struct lmb_region" and in "struct lmb_region".

but I have no objection to change it.


PS: I introduce this flag to keep the previous behavior and previous struct size on other platform

      when I push the commit 6d66502bc741 ("lmb: Add 2 config to define the max number of regions")

Regards

Patrick


Reply via email to