On 2022-01-20 06:39, Jagan Teki wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 7:53 PM <tudor.amba...@microchip.com> wrote:
On 1/20/22 3:20 PM, Michael Walle wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
content is safe
>
>>> + {
>>> + INFO("w25q16jvm", 0xef7015, 0, 64 * 1024, 32,
>>
>> Can this name as "w25q16jv-im/jm" ?
>
> FWIW, "w25q15jvm" would be the "correct" name in linux. Although for this
> particular flash the name in linux is "w25q16jv-im/jm"..
would you fix it? :D
>
> Anyhow, see [1] for a lengthy discussion on that name. That being said, I
> still don't share Tudors opinion on using that made up name, just because
> no one will find any flash if one searches for w25q16jvm in the internet.
The temperature range "I/J" is skipped in the name because it does not
have
any influence on the jedec-id. That's why we don't include the
"Package Type"
field in the naming convention as well.
Okay, I'm merging v3. let me know if you have any questions?
Thanks !
Thanks,
Jagan.
