Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote on 2010/11/23 20:32:32:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 19:48:48 +0100
> Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/include/common.h b/include/common.h
> > index 8bca04f..f257ea4 100644
> > --- a/include/common.h
> > +++ b/include/common.h
> > @@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ typedef volatile unsigned char   vu_char;
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_MPC83xx
> >  #include <mpc83xx.h>
> >  #include <asm/immap_83xx.h>
> > +const void * link_off(const void *);
> > +#else
> > +#define link_off(x) ((const void *)(x))
> >  #endif
>
> What is special about 83xx?

Nothing, just it is the first one.
>
> If it's just that 83xx is the only one that this type of relocation has
> been enabled on so far, define a symbol for that.

there is a
#define LINK_OFF(x) ((__typeof__(x))link_off(x))
already but I am guessing you mean something else.
Perhaps a dummy link_off for other targets? Don't think
that is any better.

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to