On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 23:14:06 +0100 Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se> wrote:
> Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> wrote on 2010/11/23 22:20:58: > > "load address" being pre-relocation? Currently these must be equal > > (which doesn't seem particularly burdensome). > > Yes, but in our case we update the boot in the field and we want to > make that safer by having two uboot areas but we don't want to carry around > two u-boot images. How about playing with BATs before entering C code, so that the image always appears at the same effective address? In fact, we could probably do something similar when copying to RAM as well, and not need any sort of link relocation. -Scott _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
