On Saturday 20 November 2010 01:12:22 Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: > > Dear Sandeep, > > > > In message <0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5dbd1c1...@dlee01.ent.ti.com> > > > > you wrote: > > > I came across this patch that might be useful > > > > > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067534.html > > > > > > In any case since the u-boot structure has changed this cannot be > > > applied. If anybody is interested please send a new patch. > > > > That's actually prtty straightforward. Here it comes (completely > > untested :-)
Yes, this straightforward change looks ok to me.
> Thanks but this now effects both OMAP3 and OMAP4, it needs quite a bit of
> testing in my opinion.
Why do you think it affects OMAP4?
> > +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap3/cache.S
^^^^^
OMAP4 uses Cortex-A9 with totally different bits in Auxiliary Control Register.
This ASA bit (and the patch) is only relevant for Cortex-A8.
Anyway, additional testing and ACK would be surely welcome :-)
Is there anything else expected to be done from my side? As I mentioned before,
I would really prefer if TI could deal with this stuff themselves. Just because
they ought to have all the most relevant information.
--
Best regards,
Siarhei Siamashka
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
