On 1/25/22 17:50, Pali Rohár wrote:
On Tuesday 25 January 2022 16:53:05 Stefan Roese wrote:
On 1/17/22 16:38, Pali Rohár wrote:
'pci regions' currently prints only region information from bus 0 which
belongs to controller 0. Parser for 'pci regions' cmdline currently ignores
any additional arguments and so U-Boot always uses bus 0.
Regions are stored in controller (not on the bus) and therefore to retrieve
controller from the bus, it is needed to call pci_get_controller() which
returns root bus. Because bus 0 is root bus, current code worked fine for
controller 0.
Extend cmdline parser for 'pci regions' to allows specifying bus number,
extend pci_show_regions() code to accept also non-zero bus number and
print bus ranges for which is regions configuration assigned.
Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár <p...@kernel.org>
Nitpicking comment below. But still:
Reviewed-by: Stefan Roese <s...@denx.de>
Thanks,
Stefan
---
cmd/pci.c | 10 ++++++----
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmd/pci.c b/cmd/pci.c
index 3b1863f139c9..53edf0d90010 100644
--- a/cmd/pci.c
+++ b/cmd/pci.c
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static const struct pci_flag_info {
static void pci_show_regions(struct udevice *bus)
{
- struct pci_controller *hose = dev_get_uclass_priv(bus);
+ struct pci_controller *hose =
dev_get_uclass_priv(pci_get_controller(bus));
const struct pci_region *reg;
int i, j;
@@ -452,6 +452,7 @@ static void pci_show_regions(struct udevice *bus)
return;
}
+ printf("Buses %02x-%02x\n", hose->first_busno, hose->last_busno);
printf("# %-18s %-18s %-18s %s\n", "Bus start", "Phys start", "Size",
"Flags");
for (i = 0, reg = hose->regions; i < hose->region_count; i++, reg++) {
@@ -520,8 +521,9 @@ static int do_pci(struct cmd_tbl *cmdtp, int flag, int
argc, char *const argv[])
value = 0;
argc--;
}
- if (argc > 1)
- busnum = hextoul(argv[1], NULL);
+ if (argc > 2 || (argc > 1 && cmd != 'r' && argv[1][0]
!= 's')) {
+ busnum = hextoul(argv[argc - 1], NULL);
+ }
Nitpicking:
Single line statements without parentheses is preferred.
In next patches I'm adding more statements into this branch and I did
not wanted to make next patches too noisy.
Thanks for the explanation. Fine with me. RB tag is already sent.
Thanks,
Stefan