Hi Soeren, On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 at 12:15, Soeren Moch <sm...@web.de> wrote: > > > > On 08.03.22 17:56, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, 8 Mar 2022 at 09:49, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote: > >> > >> On 3/8/22 12:36, AKASHI Takahiro wrote: > >>> With this patch set[1] applied, UEFI subsystem maintains a list of its > >>> disk objects dynamically at runtime based on block device's probing. > >>> (See "issues" below.) > >>> > >>> [1]https://github.com/t-akashi/u-boot/tree/efi/dm_disk > >> > >> This series together with Simon's series breaks multiple boards due to > >> size constraints: > >> > >> https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-efi/-/pipelines/11197 > >> > >> Please, investigate how to work around this issue. > > > > tbs2910 - perhaps we should just drop this board? It doesn't use > > DM_SERIAL and still uses OF_EMBED > > Are we again at the same point? You are breaking working boards with > (for these boards) useless additions, and all you come up with is > "remove this board". Of course without adding the board maintainer.
I'm just expressing reasonable frustration that this board uses OF_EMBED and does not use DM_SERIAL, after all of this time. Why should the rest of the U-Boot developers care more about this board than the maintainer? Regards, Simon