HI Tom On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 6:44 PM Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 06:37:18PM +0100, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote: > > Hi Tom > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 6:30 PM Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 06:27:38PM +0100, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > > > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 6:25 PM Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 06:08:18PM +0100, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 6:03 PM Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 05:48:59PM +0100, Michael Nazzareno > > > > > > > Trimarchi wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 5:05 PM Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 02:51:01PM +0100, Michael Nazzareno > > > > > > > > > Trimarchi wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 2:25 PM Fabio Estevam > > > > > > > > > > <feste...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 6:47 AM Michael Nazzareno > > > > > > > > > > > Trimarchi > > > > > > > > > > > <mich...@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > HI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please send me a link to apply your series > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can get the series from patchwork (just click in the > > > > > > > > > > > 'series' button) > > > > > > > > > > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220112133127.16880-2-gaurav.j...@nxp.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Done, well, I have tried remove DM_GPIO in SPL. Seems that > > > > > > > > > > I need to > > > > > > > > > > remove a lot of features. I have tested LTO build but size > > > > > > > > > > of SPL increase. Is that strange? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That is very strange. Can you post your patches somewhere? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Start from here 9776c4e9d00ac49d6388ffe9e084ff03b37ae479 > > > > > > > > export ARCH=arm > > > > > > > > export CROSS_COMPILE=arm-linux-gnueabihf- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > make imx6dl_mamoj_defconfig > > > > > > > > build it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Try then to enable LTO and build it again > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spl/u-boot-spl.bin exceeds file size limit: > > > > > > > > limit: 0xefa0 bytes > > > > > > > > actual: 0xf071 bytes > > > > > > > > excess: 0xd1 bytes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So LTO does not help even on beginning on this board. You don't > > > > > > > > need > > > > > > > > to apply any patch for this test > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think that's some artifact of mixing LTO/non-LTO and the world > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > getting rebuilt? Just enabling LTO after the defconfig works > > > > > > > fine and > > > > > > > is smaller than before. > > > > > > > > > > > > In order to save space I did not change what we have. Every build > > > > > > starts from > > > > > > a mrproper and new configuration. I can not mix LTO/non-LTO in this > > > > > > case. I'm > > > > > > using upstream defconfig and upstream defconfig + LTO enabled and > > > > > > the result is > > > > > > that spl increase in size for LTO building. I'm working to keep out > > > > > > part that are not really needed but > > > > > > I was hoping that LTO give me some help here > > > > > > > > > > Yes, LTO saves about 5KiB on the SPL binary. You just need to enable > > > > > it > > > > > in the config before you start building, not after you've built > > > > > everything once. > > > > > > > > Offcourse ;) but this not the case. I don't drink enough to think that > > > > change a config, decrease the build size ;) > > > > > > LTO is an entirely different way of the compiler / linker optimizing the > > > binary. So yes, in this case enabling a single option decreases the > > > size. > > > > > > I think we are in a circle. Let's have the result with LTO > > > > spl/keep-syms-lto.c > > ( cd spl && arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles > > -fuse-linker-plugin -flto=8 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes > > -Wno-format-security -fno-builtin -ffreestanding -std=gnu11 > > -fshort-wchar -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-PIE -Os -flto=8 > > -fno-stack-protector -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -Wno-pointer-sign > > -Wno-stringop-truncation -Wno-array-bounds -Wno-stringop-overflow > > -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -fmacro-prefix-map=./= -g -fstack-usage > > -Wno-format-nonliteral -Wno-address-of-packed-member > > -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Werror=date-time -Wno-packed-not-aligned > > -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-stack-protector -D__KERNEL__ > > -D__UBOOT__ -DCONFIG_SPL_BUILD -D__ARM__ -Wa,-mimplicit-it=always > > -mthumb -mthumb-interwork -mabi=aapcs-linux -mno-unaligned-access > > -fno-common -ffixed-r9 -msoft-float -mgeneral-regs-only -pipe > > -march=armv7-a -D__LINUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 -mtune=generic-armv7-a > > -Ispl/include -Iinclude -I./arch/arm/include -include > > ./include/linux/kconfig.h -nostdinc -isystem > > /usr/lib/gcc-cross/arm-linux-gnueabihf/9/include -Wl,-T > > -Wl,u-boot-spl.lds -Wl,-Bstatic -Wl,--gc-sections > > -Wl,--no-dynamic-linker -Wl,--build-id=none -Wl,-Ttext -Wl,0x00908000 > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/start.o -Wl,--whole-archive > > arch/arm/cpu/armv7/built-in.o arch/arm/cpu/built-in.o > > arch/arm/lib/built-in.o arch/arm/mach-imx/built-in.o > > board/bticino/mamoj/built-in.o common/spl/built-in.o > > common/init/built-in.o boot/built-in.o common/built-in.o > > cmd/built-in.o env/built-in.o lib/built-in.o disk/built-in.o > > drivers/built-in.o drivers/usb/dwc3/built-in.o > > drivers/usb/cdns3/built-in.o dts/built-in.o fs/built-in.o > > keep-syms-lto.o arch/arm/lib/eabi_compat.o arch/arm/lib/lib.a > > -Wl,--no-whole-archive -Wl,-Map,u-boot-spl.map -o u-boot-spl ) > > arm-linux-gnueabihf-objcopy -j .text -j .secure_text -j > > .secure_data -j .rodata -j .hash -j .data -j .got -j .got.plt -j > > .u_boot_list -j .rel.dyn -j .binman_sym_table -j .text_rest -j > > .dtb.init.rodata -j .efi_runtime -j .efi_runtime_rel -O binary > > spl/u-boot-spl spl/u-boot-spl-nodtb.bin > > arm-linux-gnueabihf-objdump -t spl/u-boot-spl > spl/u-boot-spl.sym > > cat spl/u-boot-spl-nodtb.bin spl/u-boot-spl.dtb > spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin > > cp spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin spl/u-boot-spl.bin > > spl/u-boot-spl.bin exceeds file size limit: > > limit: 0xefa0 bytes > > actual: 0xf079 bytes > > excess: 0xd9 bytes > > make: *** [Makefile:2082: spl/u-boot-spl.bin] Error 1 > > make: *** Deleting file 'spl/u-boot-spl.bin' > > > > and without > > > > NUX_ARM_ARCH__=7 -mtune=generic-armv7-a -D__ASSEMBLY__ -x c -o > > spl/u-boot-spl.cfgout arch/arm/mach-imx/spl_sd.cfg > > ./tools/mkimage -n spl/u-boot-spl.cfgout -T imximage -e 0x00908000 > > -d spl/u-boot-spl.bin SPL >SPL.log && cat SPL.log > > Image Type: Freescale IMX Boot Image > > Image Ver: 2 (i.MX53/6/7 compatible) > > Mode: DCD > > Data Size: 73824 Bytes = 72.09 KiB = 0.07 MiB > > Load Address: 00907420 > > Entry Point: 00908000 > > HAB Blocks: 0x00907400 0x00000000 0x0000fc00 > > DCD Blocks: 0x00910000 0x0000002c 0x00000004 > > make -f ./scripts/Makefile.build obj=arch/arm/mach-imx u-boot-with-spl.imx > > mkdir -p spl/ > > ./tools/mkimage -n spl/u-boot-spl.cfgout -T imximage -e 0x00908000 > > -d spl/u-boot-spl.bin SPL >SPL.log && cat SPL.log > > Image Type: Freescale IMX Boot Image > > Image Ver: 2 (i.MX53/6/7 compatible) > > Mode: DCD > > Data Size: 73824 Bytes = 72.09 KiB = 0.07 MiB > > Load Address: 00907420 > > Entry Point: 00908000 > > HAB Blocks: 0x00907400 0x00000000 0x0000fc00 > > DCD Blocks: 0x00910000 0x0000002c 0x00000004 > > arm-linux-gnueabihf-objcopy -j .text -j .secure_text -j > > .secure_data -j .rodata -j .hash -j .data -j .got -j .got.plt -j > > .u_boot_list -j .rel.dyn -j .binman_sym_table -j .text_rest -j > > .dtb.init.rodata -j .efi_runtime -j .efi_runtime_rel -I binary -O > > binary --pad-to=0x11000 SPL u-boot-with-spl.imx && cat u-boot.img >> > > u-boot-with-spl.imx || rm -f u-boot-with-spl.imx > > > > > > What I'm trying to say is that I have followed the correct steps and > > this is the LTO change > > > > git diff > > diff --git a/configs/imx6dl_mamoj_defconfig b/configs/imx6dl_mamoj_defconfig > > index ae27857e6f..4a535012b2 100644 > > --- a/configs/imx6dl_mamoj_defconfig > > +++ b/configs/imx6dl_mamoj_defconfig > > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ CONFIG_SPL_TEXT_BASE=0x00908000 > > CONFIG_SPL_DRIVERS_MISC=y > > CONFIG_IMX_HAB=y > > # CONFIG_CMD_BMODE is not set > > +CONFIG_LTO=y > > CONFIG_DISTRO_DEFAULTS=y > > CONFIG_BOOTDELAY=3 > > CONFIG_SPL_OS_BOOT=y > > Here's what I see: > $ git describe HEAD > v2022.04-rc4-50-g9776c4e9d00a > $ make imx6dl_mamoj_defconfig > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > YACC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.c > LEX scripts/kconfig/zconf.lex.c > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/zconf.tab.o > HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf > # > # configuration written to .config > # > $ sed -i -e 's/# CONFIG_LTO is not set/CONFIG_LTO=y/' .config > $ grep LTO .config > CONFIG_ARCH_SUPPORTS_LTO=y > CONFIG_LTO=y > $ make > CROSS_COMPILE=~/.buildman-toolchains/gcc-11.1.0-nolibc/arm-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi- > -sj12 > ===================== WARNING ====================== > This board does not use CONFIG_DM_SERIAL (Driver Model > for Serial drivers). Please update the board to use > CONFIG_DM_SERIAL before the v2023.04 release. Failure to > update by the deadline may result in board removal. > See doc/driver-model/migration.rst for more info. > ==================================================== > arch/arm/dts/imx6dl-dhcom-pdk2.dtb: Warning (pwms_property): > /display-bl:pwms: cell 3 is not a phandle reference > arch/arm/dts/imx6dl-dhcom-pdk2.dtb: Warning (pwms_property): /display-bl: > Missing property '#pwm-cells' in node /soc/bus@2000000/gpc@20dc000 or bad > phandle (referred from pwms[3]) > arch/arm/dts/imx6q-dhcom-pdk2.dtb: Warning (pwms_property): /display-bl:pwms: > cell 3 is not a phandle reference > arch/arm/dts/imx6q-dhcom-pdk2.dtb: Warning (pwms_property): /display-bl: > Missing property '#pwm-cells' in node /soc/bus@2000000/gpc@20dc000 or bad > phandle (referred from pwms[3]) > $ ls -lh spl/u-boot-spl* > -rwxrwxr-x 1 trini trini 944K Mar 19 13:40 spl/u-boot-spl > -rw-rw-r-- 1 trini trini 54K Mar 19 13:40 spl/u-boot-spl.bin > -rw-rw-r-- 1 trini trini 1.6K Mar 19 13:40 spl/u-boot-spl.cfgout > -rw-rw-r-- 1 trini trini 2.2K Mar 19 13:40 spl/u-boot-spl.dtb > -rw-rw-r-- 1 trini trini 54K Mar 19 13:40 spl/u-boot-spl-dtb.bin > -rw-rw-r-- 1 trini trini 728 Mar 19 13:40 spl/u-boot-spl.lds > -rw-rw-r-- 1 trini trini 5.9K Mar 19 13:40 spl/u-boot-spl.ltrans0.ltrans.su > -rw-rw-r-- 1 trini trini 7.2K Mar 19 13:40 spl/u-boot-spl.ltrans1.ltrans.su > -rw-rw-r-- 1 trini trini 182K Mar 19 13:40 spl/u-boot-spl.map > -rwxrwxr-x 1 trini trini 51K Mar 19 13:40 spl/u-boot-spl-nodtb.bin > -rw-rw-r-- 1 trini trini 135K Mar 19 13:40 spl/u-boot-spl.sym >
The only difference is the toolchain gcc version 9.4.0 (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04) and for the result you get I'm agree with you. Michael > -- > Tom -- Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi Co-Founder & Chief Executive Officer M. +39 347 913 2170 mich...@amarulasolutions.com __________________________________ Amarula Solutions BV Joop Geesinkweg 125, 1114 AB, Amsterdam, NL T. +31 (0)85 111 9172 i...@amarulasolutions.com www.amarulasolutions.com