Rename board_info structure to dm9000_priv to make it clear what this
structure really contains, the driver private data. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <ma...@denx.de>
Cc: Joe Hershberger <joe.hershber...@ni.com>
Cc: Ramon Fried <rfried....@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/dm9000x.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dm9000x.c b/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
index 85f3c079ec1..7e1368a1be9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dm9000x.c
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@
 #include "dm9000x.h"
 
 /* Structure/enum declaration ------------------------------- */
-struct board_info {
+struct dm9000_priv {
        u32 runt_length_counter;        /* counter: RX length < 64byte */
        u32 long_length_counter;        /* counter: RX length > 1514byte */
        u32 reset_counter;      /* counter: RESET */
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ struct board_info {
        struct eth_device netdev;
 };
 
-static struct board_info dm9000_info;
+static struct dm9000_priv dm9000_info;
 
 /* DM9000 network board routine ---------------------------- */
 #ifndef CONFIG_DM9000_BYTE_SWAPPED
@@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ static int dm9000_init(struct eth_device *dev, struct 
bd_info *bd)
 {
        int i, oft, lnk;
        u8 io_mode;
-       struct board_info *db = &dm9000_info;
+       struct dm9000_priv *db = &dm9000_info;
 
        /* RESET device */
        dm9000_reset();
@@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static int dm9000_init(struct eth_device *dev, struct 
bd_info *bd)
 static int dm9000_send(struct eth_device *netdev, void *packet, int length)
 {
        int tmo;
-       struct board_info *db = &dm9000_info;
+       struct dm9000_priv *db = &dm9000_info;
 
        dm9000_dump_packet(__func__, packet, length);
 
@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int dm9000_rx(struct eth_device *netdev)
        u8 rxbyte;
        u8 *rdptr = (u8 *)net_rx_packets[0];
        u16 rxstatus, rxlen = 0;
-       struct board_info *db = &dm9000_info;
+       struct dm9000_priv *db = &dm9000_info;
 
        /*
         * Check packet ready or not, we must check
-- 
2.35.1

Reply via email to