Hi Patrick

On 4/15/22 15:00, Patrick Delaunay wrote:
> Handle correctly the silicon revision = REV_ID[15:0] of Device Version
> and the associated device marking, A to Z on STMicroelectronics STM32MP
> SOCs.
> 
> This patch prepare the introduction of next STM32MP family,
> with STM32MP13x Rev.Z for REV_ID = 1.1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delau...@foss.st.com>
> ---
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cpu.c                    | 6 +++---
>  arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/sys_proto.h | 9 +++++----
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cpu.c b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cpu.c
> index 325d710100..0ad5f307db 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/cpu.c
> @@ -432,13 +432,13 @@ static void get_cpu_string_offsets(unsigned int *type, 
> unsigned int *pkg,
>  
>       /* Revision */
>       switch (get_cpu_rev()) {
> -     case CPU_REVA:
> +     case CPU_REV1:
>               *rev = 1;
>               break;
> -     case CPU_REVB:
> +     case CPU_REV2:
>               *rev = 2;
>               break;
> -     case CPU_REVZ:
> +     case CPU_REV2_1:
>               *rev = 3;
>               break;
>       default:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/sys_proto.h 
> b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/sys_proto.h
> index 4149d3a133..b91f98eb45 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/sys_proto.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/include/mach/sys_proto.h
> @@ -25,11 +25,12 @@ u32 get_cpu_type(void);
>  /* return CPU_DEV constants */
>  u32 get_cpu_dev(void);
>  
> -#define CPU_REVA     0x1000
> -#define CPU_REVB     0x2000
> -#define CPU_REVZ     0x2001
> +#define CPU_REV1     0x1000
> +#define CPU_REV1_1   0x1001
> +#define CPU_REV2     0x2000
> +#define CPU_REV2_1   0x2001
>  
> -/* return CPU_REV constants */
> +/* return Silicon revision = REV_ID[15:0] of Device Version */
>  u32 get_cpu_rev(void);
>  
>  /* Get Package options from OTP */

Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard <patrice.chot...@foss.st.com>

Thanks
Patrice

Reply via email to