Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4d008638.4060...@aribaud.net> you wrote: > > > This patch is not needed, if no undefined weak symbol is available. > > This patch adds .plt/.rel.plt section which has R_ARM_JUMP_SLOT which is > > not handled in code. Therefore we do not really know what this patch does > > to the code, it was mostly a patch to handle the linker segfault described > > several times. > > Thanks for pointing this out. My bad: I did not relate the two series > when going through patchwork. > > Wolfgang, I was about to send out a revert but after pulling u-boot.git > and u-boot-arm.git I don't see Andreas' patch in there. If you haven't > committed it yet, maybe you can fix this yourself?
Hm... strange... I am absolutely sure that I did apply these patches last night, and then I even pushed them out... ... but now I see no trace of this either. Don't know what happened (I should learn this lesson - this is what I get when _not_ having a beer ;-) Ummm... now I have a problem, because I have marked all these patches as "applied", both in patchwork and in my mail reader. This actually means that I have completely lost track of what is missing and which patches should be applied :-( Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de You can do this in a number of ways. IBM chose to do all of them. Why do you find that funny? -- D. Taylor, Computer Science 350 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot