On Sat, May 28, 2022 at 09:02:09AM +0000, Leo Liang wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 09:30:49AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2022 at 02:36:29AM +0000, Leo Liang wrote: > > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > The following changes since commit > > > 7e0edcadb09d55d5319fdc862041fd1b874476f5: > > > > > > Merge branch 'master' of > > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-sunxi (2022-05-24 > > > 23:29:00 -0400) > > > > > > are available in the Git repository at: > > > > > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv.git > > > > > > for you to fetch changes up to c544b281cd3e549a4fcbf4ba9a05a5d72c9557dd: > > > > > > riscv: qemu: Set kernel_comp_addr_r for compressed kernel (2022-05-26 > > > 18:42:34 +0800) > > > > > > CI result shows no issue: > > > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv/-/pipelines/12131 > > > > First, I've applied this to u-boot/master now. Second, will > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/ph7pr14mb5594fd11d1be74284f554bebce...@ph7pr14mb5594.namprd14.prod.outlook.com/ > > be coming soon? Thanks! > > Hi Tom, > > This patch you mentioned will not pass CI, and the reason for that > is the toolchain used for RISC-V in CI does not have corresponding > settings for zifencei and zicsr. > (detailed disscussion: > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20220128134713.2322800-1-alexandre.gh...@canonical.com/) > (CI result: > https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-riscv/-/jobs/440735) > > The patch looks valid, but will fail CI on 32-bit configs. > If we use 32-bit toolchain to test 32-bit configs, then > problems solved. > > Do you have any comments?
I guess I'm OK with saying we should use a 32bit toolchain for 32bit riscv, if that's how things should be handled moving forward for everyone else. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
