On Thu, Jun 30, 2022 at 03:18:41PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote: > Hi Tom, > > it is more then a month where my colleague sent 2 series for adding support > for > ospi to cadence qspi driver without any reaction from a spi maintainer. > > Here are links to that series > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220512100535.16364-1-ashok.reddy.s...@xilinx.com/ > https://lore.kernel.org/all/1653455832-14763-1-git-send-email-ashok.reddy.s...@xilinx.com/ > > That's why I have created one branch and push it to my repo to run CI loop. > There is no issue that's why I think that patches should be merged. > > If you recommend to go different way please let me know.
I wish I had a better idea, but this seems overall reasonable, thanks for your patience. > > Thanks, > Michal > > > The following changes since commit d61c11b8c894fad517677dc51ee82d1eade39c01: > > Merge branch '2022-06-28-mpc85xx-and-aspeed-fixes' into next (2022-06-28 > 10:52:00 -0400) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > g...@source.denx.de:u-boot/custodians/u-boot-microblaze.git > tags/versal-qspi-for-v2022.10 > > for you to fetch changes up to 2c27fdc0705251f594ecee3de0ea195ea421e05e: > > spi: cadence-qspi: Fix programming ospi flash speed (2022-06-29 16:00:31 > +0200) > Applied to u-boot/next, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature