Hi all,
Gentle ping on the series.
Cheers,
Quentin
On 7/18/22 23:12, Xavier Drudis Ferran wrote:
El Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 05:15:52PM +0200, Quentin Schulz deia:
From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@theobroma-systems.com>
While technically not a bug, let's have some consistency in paths
returned by u-boot,spl-boot-order look-up and the one saved in
u-boot,spl-boot-device by syncing spl_boot_devices_tbl and boot_devices
node paths.
Cc: Quentin Schulz <foss+ub...@0leil.net>
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz <quentin.sch...@theobroma-systems.com>
---
Tested on a Rock-Pi-4B and didn't see any regression.
Tested-by: Xavier Drudis Ferran <xdru...@tinet.cat>
Reviewed-by: Xavier Drudis Ferran <xdru...@tinet.cat>
arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
index f280cb1dbf..7147dc09f5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-rockchip/rk3399/rk3399.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ const char *spl_decode_boot_device(u32 boot_device)
} spl_boot_devices_tbl[] = {
{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC2, "/mmc@fe320000" },
{ BOOT_DEVICE_MMC1, "/mmc@fe330000" },
- { BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000" },
+ { BOOT_DEVICE_SPI, "/spi@ff1d0000/flash@0" },
};
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(spl_boot_devices_tbl); ++i)
--
2.36.1
