On 12/09/22, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote: > Hi Alain, > > On 9/9/22 18:06, Alain Volmat wrote: > > Current function stm32_i2c_message_xfer is sending a STOP > > whatever the result of the transaction is. This can cause issues > > such as making the bus busy since the controller itself is already > > sending automatically a STOP when a NACK is generated. > > > > Thanks to Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz for diagnosing and proposing a first > > fix for this. [1] > > > > [1] > > https://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/20220815145211.31342-2-jo...@foundries.io/ > > > > Reported-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries <jo...@foundries.io> > > Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jo...@foundries.io> > > Signed-off-by: Alain Volmat <alain.vol...@foss.st.com> > > --- > > drivers/i2c/stm32f7_i2c.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/stm32f7_i2c.c b/drivers/i2c/stm32f7_i2c.c > > index 0ec67b5c12..2db7f44d44 100644 > > --- a/drivers/i2c/stm32f7_i2c.c > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/stm32f7_i2c.c > > @@ -483,9 +483,9 @@ static int stm32_i2c_message_xfer(struct stm32_i2c_priv > > *i2c_priv, > > } > > } > > - /* End of transfer, send stop condition */ > > - mask = STM32_I2C_CR2_STOP; > > - setbits_le32(®s->cr2, mask); > > + /* End of transfer, send stop condition if appropriate */ > > + if (!ret && !(status & (STM32_I2C_ISR_NACKF | STM32_I2C_ISR_ERRORS))) > > + setbits_le32(®s->cr2, STM32_I2C_CR2_STOP); > > return stm32_i2c_check_end_of_message(i2c_priv); > > } > > > > Reviewed-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delau...@foss.st.com> > Tested-by: Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delau...@foss.st.com> [stm32mp157c-dk2] > > No regression detection on ST Microelectonics board. > > - No error trace on boot > > - I2C probe command is OK > > STM32MP> i2c probe > Valid chip addresses: 28 33 > > - And other tests done with the 2 I2C devices STPMIC1 & STUSB1600 are ok: > regulalor command > > pmic status command > > USB type C connection/deconnection > > > @Jorge: can you test also for your use-case, thanks
yes I did test a few hours ago and it is good on my end. can add my tested tag if needed Tested-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jo...@foundries.io> btw I also sent a patch to fix the way some dts properties are handled. shall I submit separately or will it be includeed in this set? > > > Thanks > Patrick > >