On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 01:08:26PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
>
> On 10/11/22 09:35, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 07:58:11AM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 10/11/22 02:49, AKASHI Takahiro wrote:
> > > > The commit message is not accurate.
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 04:06:23PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > > > The CloseProtocol() boot service requires a handle as first argument.
> > > > > Passing the protocol interface is incorrect.
> > > >
> > > > Correct, but
> > > >
> > > > > CloseProtocol() only has an effect if called with a non-zero value for
> > > > > agent_handle. HandleProtocol() uses an opaque agent_handle when
> > > > > invoking
> > > > > OpenProtocol() (currently NULL).
> > > >
> > > > No. OpenProtocol() is called with efi_root as an agent handle.
> > > > So, calling CloseProtocol() is a right thing at the end.
> > >
> > > Typically an agent handle is used to relate to a driver exposing the
> > > driver
> > > binding protocol.
> >
> > Why can't we, other than a driver, call HandleProtocol()
> > as a convenient way of accessing an interface?
>
> The description of HandleProtocol() clearly says that it is deprecated.
>
> The assumption that the UEFI specification makes in it is example code that
> you never be able to close a protocol opened with HandleProtocol.
I don't understand this statement.
I never find any description of "you never be able to close a protocol opened
with HandleProtocol" in the spec.
> After the first usage of handle protocol the open protocol information with
> the opaque agent handle will block the protocol interface from ever being
> removed by the driver exposing it.
>
> >
> > > The root node does not expose the driver binding protocol.
> >
> > So do you mean the current implementation of HandleProtocol() is wrong?
>
> Yes. If you ever install a boot time driver, it might remove a protocol
> interface which is actually still in use.
Again, what about efi_load_image_from_path() that I gave in another example?
I think that you have something to do *before* you submit this patch.
Anyhow, your commit message is not accurate.
-Takahiro Akashi
> >
> > > Why would you want to create an open protocol information entry here?
> >
> > To access get_image_info() quickly.
>
> This is not related to an open protocol information (see the UEFI spec
> description of OpenProtocolInformation()).
>
> Best regards
>
> Heinrich
>
> >
> > > Do you think anything with the code after the patch is wrong?
> >
> > No reason to replace handle_protocol().
> >
> > Another example is here:
> > efi_load_image_from_path()
> > efi_handle_protocol(device, guid, (void **)&load_file_protocol));
> > ...
> > efi_close_protocol(device, guid, efi_root, NULL);
> >
> > I believe that this function is anything but a driver.
> > I think using HandleProtocol() (or preferably OpenProtocol()) and
> > CloseProtocol()
> > in pair seems totally sane.
> >
> > -Takahiro Akashi
> >
> >
> >
> > > Best regards
> > >
> > > Heinrich
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Therefore HandleProtocol() should be
> > > > > avoided.
> > > > >
> > > > > * Replace the LocateHandle() call by efi_search_protocol().
> > > >
> > > > LocateHandle() -> efi_handle_protocol()
> > > >
> > > > So you could have fixed this way:
> > > > EFI_CALL(efi_close_protocol(handle, ..., &efi_root, NULL);
> > > >
> > > > I preferred to use EFI_CALL() over this file as you can see.
> > > >
> > > > -Takahiro Akashi
> > > >
> > > > > * Remove the CloseProtocol() call.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fixes: 8d99026f0697 ("efi_loader: capsule: support firmware update")
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c | 14 ++++++--------
> > > > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c
> > > > > b/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c
> > > > > index b6bd2d6af8..397e393a18 100644
> > > > > --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c
> > > > > +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_capsule.c
> > > > > @@ -159,12 +159,14 @@ efi_fmp_find(efi_guid_t *image_type, u8
> > > > > image_index, u64 instance,
> > > > > efi_status_t ret;
> > > > > for (i = 0, handle = handles; i < no_handles; i++, handle++) {
> > > > > - ret = EFI_CALL(efi_handle_protocol(
> > > > > - *handle,
> > > > > - &efi_guid_firmware_management_protocol,
> > > > > - (void **)&fmp));
> > > > > + struct efi_handler *fmp_handler;
> > > > > +
> > > > > + ret = efi_search_protocol(
> > > > > + *handle,
> > > > > &efi_guid_firmware_management_protocol,
> > > > > + &fmp_handler);
> > > > > if (ret != EFI_SUCCESS)
> > > > > continue;
> > > > > + fmp = fmp_handler->protocol_interface;
> > > > > /* get device's image info */
> > > > > info_size = 0;
> > > > > @@ -215,10 +217,6 @@ efi_fmp_find(efi_guid_t *image_type, u8
> > > > > image_index, u64 instance,
> > > > > skip:
> > > > > efi_free_pool(package_version_name);
> > > > > free(image_info);
> > > > > - EFI_CALL(efi_close_protocol(
> > > > > - (efi_handle_t)fmp,
> > > > > - &efi_guid_firmware_management_protocol,
> > > > > - NULL, NULL));
> > > > > if (found)
> > > > > return fmp;
> > > > > }
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.37.2
> > > > >
