Am 10.01.2011 16:05, schrieb Wolfgang Denk: > Dear Alexander Holler, > > In message<4d2b1d75.70...@ahsoftware.de> you wrote: >> >> Beeing kind of a defensive programmer, I still would prefer to use have >> that __asm__ for write* too. That would at least prevent us from a >> possible bug there too. > > So why don't you simply test and, assuming it's working, ACK the patch > I submitted yesterday? We should be on the safe side, then, and don't > have to care about which mood the current compiler's optimizer might > be in or what the POM is.
Sorry, I haven't had your last patch (mail) before I've written the mail you are referencing. I have updated my mail-system at home (armv5 with 128mb ram) and the incoming queue, mainly filled through lkml, is still not completly processed. ~2000 messages (3 days) need some time to go through spamassassin on such a low-level hardware. ;) I've seen you've switched from do {} while() to "something else", but I can't comment on that "something else". Because I've already switched to 4.5.2. I'll have to dig out a system where I have a 4.5.1 to test the problem occured with the write. If anybody else already has tested it, I'm fine with it. Regards, Alexander _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot