Hi Varun

Yes, I think the GitHub issue tracker can be used for all those things. Also, 
the TF-A list can be used for general questions/discussion - that has more 
visibility.

Cheers

Dan.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Varun Wadekar <vwade...@nvidia.com>
> Sent: 15 November 2022 15:29
> To: Jose Marinho <jose.mari...@arm.com>; Simon Glass
> <s...@chromium.org>; Dan Handley <dan.hand...@arm.com>
> Cc: t...@lists.trustedfirmware.org; u-boot@lists.denx.de; boot-
> architect...@lists.linaro.org; nd <n...@arm.com>
> Subject: RE: [TF-A] Re: [RFC] Proposed location to host the firmware handoff
> specification.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the email. Jose, how do we create bugs, provide ideas, or ask
> questions? Do you suggest creating issues for all of these?
> 
> -Varun
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jose Marinho via TF-A <t...@lists.trustedfirmware.org>
> Sent: Monday, 14 November 2022 3:30 PM
> To: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>; Dan Handley
> <dan.hand...@arm.com>
> Cc: t...@lists.trustedfirmware.org; u-boot@lists.denx.de; boot-
> architect...@lists.linaro.org; nd <n...@arm.com>
> Subject: [TF-A] Re: [RFC] Proposed location to host the firmware handoff
> specification.
> 
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> We're glad to announce that the Firmware Handoff document sources are
> now available publicly from:
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
> ub.com%2FFirmwareHandoff%2Ffirmware_handoff&amp;data=05%7C01%7
> Cvwadekar%40nvidia.com%7C1802d934994a45de3f4f08dac655668a%7C43083
> d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C638040367718884340%7CUnkn
> own%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik
> 1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=G1T9ndA4NlbTJ
> vQ%2BuWVu1S%2FQNjGkA6HicXD%2FS%2FuaG8Q%3D&amp;reserved=0
> 
> Note that this does not constitute a full "1.0" release of the document.
> There are still some topics raised in the ML that need to be aligned on before
> the full release -- I'll follow up on those with a separate e-mail.
> 
> Having the document hosted in a public repo allows for all discussions about
> the document to progress in the open more easily.
> 
> Regards,
> Jose
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2022 4:05 AM
> To: Dan Handley <dan.hand...@arm.com>
> Cc: t...@lists.trustedfirmware.org; u-boot@lists.denx.de; boot-
> architect...@lists.linaro.org; nd <n...@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: [TF-A] Re: [RFC] Proposed location to host the firmware handoff
> specification.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I discussed this with Jose a white back. I am OK with this as an interim
> measure to get the initial doc agreed, so long as we move it to a more
> independent place when available.
> 
> Regards,
> Simon
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, 13 Sept 2022 at 09:48, Dan Handley <dan.hand...@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all
> >
> > Just picking up this old thread again...
> >
> > There seemed to be general agreement to host the firmware hand-off
> spec in a separate repo with separate maintainers at TrustedFirmware.org, at
> least initially. Arm intends to progress with the initial population of this 
> repo.
> We intend to use the CC-BY-SA-4.0
> (https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fspd
> x.org%2Flicenses%2FCC-BY-SA-
> 4.0.html&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cvwadekar%40nvidia.com%7C1802d934994a
> 45de3f4f08dac655668a%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%
> 7C638040367718884340%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAw
> MDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%
> 7C&amp;sdata=eB3APd46h8VOPyIPSd1XtIiAziKVr6GMTX3T2UAT39c%3D&am
> p;reserved=0) license, the same as used for EBBR
> (https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith
> ub.com%2FARM-
> software%2Febbr&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cvwadekar%40nvidia.com%7C1802
> d934994a45de3f4f08dac655668a%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7
> C0%7C0%7C638040367719040563%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoi
> MC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C300
> 0%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=w%2FKV4fHrVWZKkDjtQOAFhkUr6axGHLnKhGCp
> 2fcbb74%3D&amp;reserved=0). Please say if you have any objections to this.
> We will also seek approval from the TrustedFirmware.org board.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Dan.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > boot-architecture mailing list -- boot-architect...@lists.linaro.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to
> > boot-architecture-le...@lists.linaro.org
> _______________________________________________
> boot-architecture mailing list -- boot-architect...@lists.linaro.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to boot-architecture-le...@lists.linaro.org
> --
> TF-A mailing list -- t...@lists.trustedfirmware.org To unsubscribe send an
> email to tf-a-le...@lists.trustedfirmware.org

Reply via email to