On 12/7/22 06:52, Vyacheslav Mitrofanov V wrote:
On Wed, 2022-12-07 at 09:42 -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 03:29:37PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Don't fall through to handling an IPv6 header as IPv4.
Fixes: ffdbf3bad5f3 ("net: ipv6: Incorporate IPv6 support into u-
boot net subsystem")
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 430975 ("Missing break in switch")
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <
heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com>
---
Do we have a unit trest of IPv6?
I guess we should at least do a IPv6 ping.
There are a few tests, yes, but more would be good.
Hello!
I have tested IPv6 (ping6 and tftpboot) with my own python scripts before
sending to pathwork. I'll do some test conversion to use them with u-boot or
add new tests for that soon!
Thanks!
Hello Vycheslav,
would you agree with that break being added? I didn't see a review response.
Best regards
Heinrich
