On 1/5/23 15:48, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
On Thu, Dec 22, 2022 at 10:45:22AM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
Hi Heinrich,
Happy new year, and thank you for the reviews.
More comments below.
On 12/13/22 22:39, Vincent Stehlé wrote:
Add a test for the case when the HII database protocol
get_package_list_handle() function is called with an invalid package list
handle.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Stehlé <vincent.ste...@arm.com>
Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de>
Cc: Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodi...@linaro.org>
---
lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_hii.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_hii.c
b/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_hii.c
index eaf3b0995d4..8a038d9f534 100644
--- a/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_hii.c
+++ b/lib/efi_selftest/efi_selftest_hii.c
@@ -605,6 +605,16 @@ static int test_hii_database_get_package_list_handle(void)
goto out;
}
+ /* Invalid package list handle. */
+ driver_handle = NULL;
+ ret = hii_database_protocol->get_package_list_handle(
+ hii_database_protocol, NULL, &driver_handle);
+ if (ret != EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER) {
Here it is unclear, if you get EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER because the
PackageListHandle is invalid or DriverHandle is NULL.
In principle, the value used to initialize the (output) parameter driver_handle
should not affect the test. Also, we are initializing driver_handle in exactly
the same way as was done in the previous test, which we know succeeded.
Anyway, if you think it makes the test more readable I can change the
initialization to something like the following:
driver_handle = (efi_handle_t)0x23456789; /* dummy */
We should test both cases separately.
Would you prefer something like the following couple of tests?
/* Invalid package list handle. */
driver_handle = (efi_handle_t)0x23456789; /* dummy */
Let's use an address that never will be allocated.
driver_handle = (efi_handle_t)~1UL;
ret = hii_database_protocol->get_package_list_handle(
hii_database_protocol, NULL, &driver_handle);
/* Invalid driver handle. */
ret = hii_database_protocol->get_package_list_handle(
hii_database_protocol, handle, NULL);
I could verify that EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER is indeed returned in both cases.
Just let me know and I will post a v2.
Looks like the right path forward.
Best regards
Heinrich
Best regards,
Vincent.
Best regards
Heinrich
+ efi_st_error("get_package_list_handle returned %u not
invalid\n",
+ (unsigned int)ret);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
result = EFI_ST_SUCCESS;
out:
