Hi Simon,
Am 24.01.2023 um 11:55 schrieb Simon Glass:
Hi Stefan,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 at 01:12, Stefan Herbrechtsmeier
<stefan.herbrechtsmeier-...@weidmueller.com> wrote:
Hi Simon,
Am 22.12.2022 um 00:08 schrieb Simon Glass:
The attribute syntax is quite verbose. Use the macro provided for this
purpose.
Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/s5p-common/timer.c | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-exynos/include/mach/cpu.h | 6 +++---
arch/x86/include/asm/global_data.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/include/asm/u-boot-x86.h | 2 +-
common/spl/spl_fit.c | 1 +
doc/develop/trace.rst | 2 +-
lib/efi_loader/efi_freestanding.c | 4 ++--
lib/trace.c | 26 +++++++++++--------------
9 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
[snip]
diff --git a/common/spl/spl_fit.c b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
index 08da7fed88e..0e026bb3d8e 100644
--- a/common/spl/spl_fit.c
+++ b/common/spl/spl_fit.c
@@ -599,6 +599,7 @@ static int spl_fit_upload_fpga(struct spl_fit_info *ctx,
int node,
debug("Ignoring compatible = %s property\n",
compatible);
}
+ return 0;
ret = fpga_load(devnum, (void *)fpga_image->load_addr,
fpga_image->size, BIT_FULL, flags);
This return makes the spl_fit_upload_fpga function useless. I assume
this change was by accident.
Yes that was a mistake. I'll send a patch.
Thanks.
Do you think it would be possible to create a sandbox driver for the
FPGA uclass? Then we could add some tests for this code.
A sandbox driver exists but the uclass is only an empty dummy.
The fpga subsystem use its own structs to describe the hardware and the
fpga_load function for example is a wrapper for xilinx_load, altera_load
and lattice_load.
Regards
Stefan