On 2/2/23 14:44, Michael Nazzareno Trimarchi wrote:
Hi

Il gio 2 feb 2023, 14:21 Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu <mailto:mon...@monstr.eu>> ha scritto:

    Hi Dario,

    On 1/5/23 10:46, Ashok Reddy Soma wrote:
     > Reserved blocks are used for storing bad block tables. With "nand bad"
     > command, these reserved blocks are shown as bad blocks. This is leading
     > to confusion when compared with Linux bad blocks. Hence, display
     > "bbt reserved" when printing reserved blocks with "nand bad" command.
     >
     > To acheive this, return 2 which represents reserved from nand_isbad_bbt()
     > instead of 1 in case of reserved blocks and catch it in cmd/nand.c.
     >
     > "nand bad" command display's hexadecimal numbers, so add "0x" prefix.
     >
     > Example log will show up as below.
     >
     > ZynqMP> nand bad
     >
     > Device 0 bad blocks:
     >    0x00400000
     >    0x16800000
     >    0x16c00000
     >    0x17000000
     >    0x3d800000
     >    0x3e400000
     >    0xe8400000
     >    0xff000000  (bbt reserved)
     >    0xff400000  (bbt reserved)
     >    0xff800000  (bbt reserved)
     >    0xffc00000  (bbt reserved)
     >    0x116800000
     >    0x116c00000
     >    0x1ff000000         (bbt reserved)
     >    0x1ff400000         (bbt reserved)
     >    0x1ff800000         (bbt reserved)
     >    0x1ffc00000         (bbt reserved)
     >
     > Signed-off-by: Ashok Reddy Soma <ashok.reddy.s...@amd.com
    <mailto:ashok.reddy.s...@amd.com>>
     > Reviewed-by: Michael Trimarchi <mich...@amarulasolutions.com
    <mailto:mich...@amarulasolutions.com>>
     > ---

    Are you going to apply this patch?


Applied already

I looked at u-boot-nand-flash git repo and I can't see it.
Where's the repo where this is merged?

Thanks,
Michal


Reply via email to