Hi Tom, On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 11:33, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 06, 2023 at 10:19:32AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 08:14, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 03:35:50PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > This is implicitly used in the source and seems useful, so add it. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > > > All of these types of changes need to be moved to the RFC split config > > > series, where we can no longer rely on the feature of undefined symbols > > > working as expected with CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(). > > > > OK I'll give that a crack. > > > > Should I resend this whole series or just mark the affected patches as > > superseded? > > I _think_ the series itself is ordered so that I can just skip the first > 20'ish patches, I'll confirm that in the next day or two.
Yes it seems OK, except you would also need to drop the RNG patch. I'll resend splc with all the patches and will wait to hear on splb. Regards, Simon
