Hi Tom, On Wed, 8 Feb 2023 at 17:40, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 03:39:37PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > This converts 1 usage of this option to the non-SPL form, since there is > > no SPL_DM_RNG defined in Kconfig > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > --- > > > > (no changes since v1) > > > > boot/vbe_request.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/boot/vbe_request.c b/boot/vbe_request.c > > index 45f1d2b7e17..312edfa2bdb 100644 > > --- a/boot/vbe_request.c > > +++ b/boot/vbe_request.c > > @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ static int handle_random_req(ofnode node, int > > default_size, > > u32 size; > > int ret; > > > > - if (!CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(DM_RNG)) > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DM_RNG)) > > return -ENOTSUPP; > > > > if (ofnode_read_u32(node, "vbe,size", &size)) { > > This breaks sandbox_vpl.
Yes I think I mentioned that this needs dropping for ordering reasons. I've moved it into splc. Regards, Simon