Hi Marek, On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 at 15:16, Marek Vasut <marek.va...@mailbox.org> wrote: > > On 3/8/23 23:23, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > > On Wed, 1 Mar 2023 at 19:09, Marek Vasut > > <marek.vasut+rene...@mailbox.org> wrote: > >> > >> Add 'fdt memory' test which works as follows: > >> - Create custom FDT with /memory node, with select #*cells, map it to > >> sysmem > >> - Perform memory fixup > >> - Read back the /memory node and validate its content > >> > >> The test case can be triggered using: > >> " > >> ./u-boot -Dc 'ut fdt' > >> " > >> To dump the full output from commands used during test, add '-v' flag. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+rene...@mailbox.org> > >> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > >> --- > >> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <heinrich.schucha...@canonical.com> > >> Cc: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > >> Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > >> --- > >> V2: Add RB from Simon > >> --- > >> test/cmd/fdt.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+) > >> > > > > This patch and some others cause test failures. I applied those that I > > could to u-boot-dm/next > > > > Can you please rebase and take a look? > > Does it work any better if you also apply: > > [PATCH] console: Use only 0x00 as line separator for console recording > > ? > > If so, then just pick the aforementioned patch and the rest of this series.
Yes, but one of the patches causes a fault in sandbox_spl: https://source.denx.de/u-boot/custodians/u-boot-dm/-/jobs/590598 Regards, Simon