Le 27/01/2011 22:32, Alexander Holler a écrit : > Am 27.01.2011 22:10, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD: >> Le 27/01/2011 21:55, Alexander Holler a écrit : >>> Am 27.01.2011 21:20, schrieb Albert ARIBAUD: >>>> Hi Alexander, >>>> >>>> Le 27/01/2011 20:42, Alexander Holler a écrit : >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Am 27.01.2011 17:03, schrieb Stefano Babic: >>>>>> Commit 8aba9dceebb14144e07d19593111ee3a999c37fc breaks >>>>>> ARM boards because for ARM the -pie option is used >>>>>> for partial linking together with -r option. >>>>>> >>>>>> The patch adds the -pie option to link u-boot.bin only. >>>>> >>>>> Using native compilation with gcc 4.5.2 and binutils 2.21 this patch >>>>> will result in an unusable u-boot. It halts here after DRAM: ... just >>>>> like it was before some relocation fixes (regarding binutils). >>>> >>>> Which board do you compile? >>> >>> Upps, sorry, that one was on a BeagleBoard (armv7, omap3). >> >> I've just tried the following to compare make logs of before commit >> 8aba9dceebb14144e07d19593111ee3a999c37fc on the one hand and after this >> commit and with the proposed fix on the other hand: > > Oh, it seems I've got misunderstood, the patch from Stefano Babic breaks > u-boot here and not the commit 8aba9dceebb14144e07d19593111ee3a999c37fc.
I think I understood you: what I do is compile without commit 8aba9dce on the one hand, and with it _plus Stefano's patch_ on the other hand, in order to see how things compiled before we split LDFLAGS (8aba9dce^) with how things compile if we split LDFLAGS (8aba9dce) with -pie in the right place (Stefano's patch). Can you try that? > Regards, > > Alexander Amicalement, -- Albert. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot