On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 11:58:03AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > There can certainly be a lot more elements in the "revisions" (and > "names") arrays than there are gpios used to form the trinary number > we're searching for; we simply don't know the array size up-front. > > Nor do we need to, because the loop body already knows to recognize > -EOVERFLOW as "not that many elements present" (and we have a test > that specifically ensures that dev_read_u32_index() returns exactly > that). So just drop the i < priv->gpio_num condition. > > While in here, fix the weird placement of the default: keyword. > > Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villem...@prevas.dk> > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.ander...@seco.com>
Applied to u-boot/next, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature