Hi Helko,

On 11/04/23 6:41 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Angelo,

On 05.04.23 00:59, Angelo Dureghello wrote:
Upgrading all board configs where i2c is involved to DM i2c.

Signed-off-by: Angelo Dureghello <ang...@kernel-space.org>
---
  configs/M5208EVBE_defconfig           | 5 +----
  configs/M5235EVB_Flash32_defconfig    | 1 +
  configs/M5235EVB_defconfig            | 1 +
  configs/M5253DEMO_defconfig           | 5 +----
  configs/M5275EVB_defconfig            | 5 +----
  configs/M53017EVB_defconfig           | 6 ++----
  configs/M5329AFEE_defconfig           | 6 ++----
  configs/M5329BFEE_defconfig           | 6 ++----
  configs/M5373EVB_defconfig            | 3 ++-
  configs/astro_mcf5373l_defconfig      | 6 ++----
  configs/eb_cpu5282_defconfig          | 5 ++---
  configs/eb_cpu5282_internal_defconfig | 5 ++---
  configs/stmark2_defconfig             | 4 ++++
  13 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

Thanks for this series, I did not find a cover letter Email,
so I have here a common question:

You rename in patch 1/6

CONFIG_SYS_I2C_0 -> CFG_SYS_I2C_0

but only add in patch 2/6 for the stmark2 this renamed define,
and add DTS nodes for other boards in patch 5/6 and here the
defconfig changes... may I oversee something obvious, but do
the other boards not also need some CFG_SYS_I2C_0 define?


CFG_SYS_I2C_0 (0 to 5) it's a define to setup pads pinmux to i2c,
but only for coldfire mcf5441x family that requires this.

m68k/cpu/mcf5445x/cpu_init.c:#ifdef CFG_SYS_I2C_0

Involved board is only stmark2, that is the board
i am using here for test. I found this define to be set
because i2c was not working, so i moved in the more proper
CFG_ namespace.

I cannot test other boards actually, but i don't find any
similar define/need in their start code, so i am supposing
other cpu families are not needing it, or using other
definitions for pinmux.

I would like one day to add pinmux setup from fdt,
but not trivial, linux does not have fdt implementation for
coldfire, so need to invent it from scratch.


Thanks!

bye,
Heiko

Thanks,
Regards,
angelo


Reply via email to